Table Charismata Matters

Tuesday, July 30, 2013

Vincent Cheung on Healing


Because he holds to a modified form of Clarkian presuppositionalism, Cheung is a controversial figure (just like other Clarkians) both in non-Calvinistic AND Calvinistic circles. Clarkians hold to Axiomatic (also called Dogmatic, or Deductive, or Rational) Presuppositionalism which includes the theological/philosophical/apologetical position of Scripturalism as well as the position of empirical skepticism. His views on Calvinism are considered by some to be hyper-Calvinistic or strongly leaning toward it. I myself am a Van Tillian Revelational Presuppositionalist rather than a Clarkian Axiomatic Presuppostionalist (though, I do appreciate some of the contributions and insights Clarkians have made in apologetics).

There are theological, apologetical, metaphysical and philosophical positions that Cheung holds to which some Calvinists will accept or reject (in part or in whole) depending on one's own variety of Calvinism. He has certain Calvinistic positions and distinctives which he brings to bear on the subject of continuationism. For example, he holds to Divine occasionalism and applies that to the issue of divine healing and God's activity in creation. Calvinists are free to hold to a Divine occasionalist understanding of causation and creaturely existence. But there are many other models that are compatible with Calvinism. Jonathan Edwards himself made statements that would sometimes imply Divine occasionalism, and at other times Divine idealism. Calvinists are also free to hold to either the A-theory or B-theory of time with respect to creation. For the record Cheung is a supralapsarian, rejects Common Grace, affirms Divine Command Theory and freely affirms the concept and accepts the term of Hard Determinism (see his book The Author of Sin for some of his distinctives). I also believe his doctrine regarding the Unpardonable/Unforgivable Sin is overly simplistic and can lead to people despairing needlessly.

I post the following links to some of Cheung's works because his writings will challenge cessationist Calvinists to reconsider their position. Also, because his teachings will encourage and enlighten his fellow continuationist Calvinists even if they don't agree with every minor point he makes. I'm in substantial agreement with Cheung on divine healing. Though, I don't necessarily hold to some of his dogmatic Calvinistic views and how he employs them in his doctrine of healing. For example, I'm open to the possible truth of occasionalism, but I don't see why it's the only consistent Calvinistic view of causation as he claims. There have been other views that Calvinists have argued for, and many of them are within the pale of Calvinistic orthodoxy.

Here are links to three works by Cheung on the subject of Divine Healing which he wrote at different times 2001, 2003 and 2013. Take in to consideration the fact that his views have developed throughout the years. They have matured and become more balanced. For example, compared to his earlier works the 2013 book is less radical on the issue of the use of natural remedies like medicine. In his latest work on healing (2013) he writes:

An important difference is that the Bible makes healing through faith the standard instead of the  exception (Matthew 8:17; James 5:14-15), so that it is unacceptable to consider it an optional aspect  of Christian life and ministry. This is not to suggest that those who use medicine should feel  condemned or that they should stop taking their medication. The point is that those who speak as if the Bible eagerly and explicitly supports the use of medicine are wrong – there is no such support in  the Bible. Rather, it teaches us to increase in our faith for healing and in our dependence on God's power.


Lectures on Biblical Healing by Vincent Cheung 2001 (or here)


Biblical Healing by Vincent Cheung 2003 (or here)


Biblical Healing by Vincent Cheung 2012 (or here, here)


Samson and His Faith by Vincent Cheung

Here's my blog page dedicated to resources on Divine Healing  HERE.


Related works by Vincent Cheung


Prayer and Revelation by Vincent Cheung 2012

Invincible Faith by Vincent Cheung

Backstage by Vincent Cheung

Fulcrum by Vincent Cheung 

Trace by Vincent Cheung

Contract by Vincent Cheung

Hero by Vincent Cheung




Blogposts by Vincent Cheung

Beginning in Healing Ministry by Vincent Cheung

Advancing in Healing Ministry by Vincent Cheung

Contending in Healing Ministry by Vincent Cheung

Healing and Ministry by Vincent Cheung

The Primacy of Healing Ministry by Vincent Cheung

Power Over Demons by Vincent Cheung

I agree with the general sentiments of the following blogposts by Cheung. However, I do think he's Wayyy too harsh on cessationists. His criticisms are like buckshot. Some of them hit, and hit HARD. While others completely miss the real target and hit strawmen.Many cessationists are doing their best to honor Christ in their teaching, but do so in ways that just aren't logical or Biblical. Their zeal to protect God's glory and reputation by disassociating themselves from extreme Charismatics and their extreme practices actually prevents God from being glorified in the ways He Himself has prescribed. Namely, by signs and wonders. Vincent Cheung's materials exposes much of that.

Faith Override by Vincent Cheung

All Things Are Yours by Vincent Cheung

The Extreme Faith Teacher by Vincent Cheung


Spotify podcast of Vincent Cheung: https://open.spotify.com/show/37qoev90ZcxyuYEu5SFSRk


Here's another related blog of mine:

List of Notable Calvinists who are also Continuationists


 See especially Johanes Lilik Susanto's doctoral thesis:

A Practical Theological Evaluation of the Divine Healing Ministries of Smith Wigglesworth and John G. Lake: A Continuationist Reformed Perspective




1 comment:

  1. In a facebook group I wrote the following. I'm posting it here so that I can copy and paste it if I need to repeat the good and problematic in I find in Cheung.
    //I also greatly benefit from Vincent Cheung's freely online books and blogs. I've read over 20 of his books and many blogs in the past 20 years or so.

    UNFORTUNATELY, there are some aspects of his theology that I can't endorse or have problems with. He's MUCH TOO hard on and harsh in his criticisms of cessationists. I'm a Van Tillian presuppositionalist. Cheung is a modified Clarkian presuppositionalist. Because of that, he holds to Scripturalism and empirical skepticism.

    He also has Hyper-Calvinistic tendencies, some of which I'm open to as options, but I don't positively hold them. But which would definitely turn some people off. I completely disagree on his doctrine of the Unpardonable Sin. His understanding is way too simplistic. He dogmatically holds to Divine occasionalism. I'm open to that position, but lean away from it. Also, occasionalism seems to presuppose an A-theory of time. Chueng may not know that because he seems to hold the B-theory. I slightly lean toward the B-theory of myself.

    He holds to Divine Command Voluntarism with respect to ethics. While I'm open to that view, I lean toward Divine Command Essentialism. He rejects Common Grace, while I affirm it. He dogmatically affirms the hardest Hard Determinism. While, I only see that as a last ditch option.

    Finally, in the last few years Cheung has so emphasized certain spiritual victory through faith that he has lost the balance with regard to a theology of suffering. We need to have BOTH a theology of the Crown/Glory/Victory AND a theology of the Cross/Suffering. Though, I do agree with him about how, all things being equal, faith trumps everything. He shouldn't leave it at that. Much more should be said. Nevertheless, his emphasis (or extreme) on victory balances some of the extremes of the Puritans' theology on suffering. One of their mottos was Vincit qui patitur [he who suffers conquers]. There's some truth to that. Jesus said, in this world you will have tribulation, be of good cheer i've overcome the world [John 16:33], and Paul said that we must through many tribulations enter the kingdom of God [acts 14:22]. At the same time, we mustn't allow setbacks to be a false indicator of God's will for our lives. There's a place for suffering for the glory of God, but not wallowing in it. We need to strive to have victory over our situations through spiritual warfare. The puritans were weak on spiritual warfare. Their teaching sometimes leads to a theology of lying down and allowing Satan and his minions to stomp all over you. We need to fight.

    Here's my collected links to critiques of Scripturalism:
    https://misclane.blogspot.com/2013/10/critiques-of-clarkianism-and.html

    Here are links to samples of Cheung's doctrine of faith. In general I agree. But again, he's too harsh on cessationists:

    Faith Override
    https://www.vincentcheung.com/2016/04/08/faith-override/

    All Things Are Yours
    https://www.vincentcheung.com/2016/04/14/all-things-are-yours/

    The Extreme Faith Teacher
    https://www.vincentcheung.com/2016/05/25/the-extreme-faith-teacher/

    ReplyDelete